Authorship Disputes: Tips to avoid conflicts
‘Authorship’ denotes the practice of providing truthful credits for intellectual contributions and innovative concepts. It not only helps authors acquire the credit for the work, but also ensures that they assume responsibility for the research conducted and presented. Moreover, it is perceived as a tool for personal satisfaction, prestige, and especially, a stepping stone in a writer’s academic career. Though the term sounds interesting, it involves high risks and problems in practice.
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) often receives disputes regarding authorship. These cases usually involve disputes like the omission of a deserving junior researcher’s name from the authors’ list or a proposal by a sponsor for including the name of a non-contributing author. However, it also received a shocking complaint from a female author, who said that her name was replaced with that of her boss in the final version when she was away on maternity leave.
Apart from having a direct impact on the publication in question, authorship disputes can also have repercussions on a writer’s fair credit, collegial relationships, future collaborations, and reputations.
Following the adage that prevention is better than cure, the following are some guiding principles to avoid conflicting situations like authorship disputes.
Adhere to the authorship criteria of the publication
Each publisher follows specific authorship guidelines enunciated by organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), Council of Science Editors (CSE), Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and Good Publication Practice (GPP2). Non-compliance with the concerned guidelines—i.e., unequal application of authorship criteria, granting authorship to undeserving individuals, and/or omitting authorship to deserving individuals—is considered to be a serious offense in the academic world and can be construed as research misconduct.
Hold prior discussions with co-authors
All the authors of a paper should discuss and finalize the authorship order and contributions along with respective responsibilities before beginning to prepare a manuscript and, if possible, even before starting a study.
Stick to the plan of action
In few cases, it has been observed that even if the authors have agreed to the sequence of authorship and contributions, fraudulent authors make last-minute changes in the manuscript or research paper just before submission. This leads to conflicts in publishing the paper, and some even end with retraction of the paper. To avoid such anomalies and unpleasant situations, it is advisable to comply with the agreement made between the author and co-authors.
However, even the best plans sometimes fail. So it is better to track and revisit the issues and monitor any changes or modifications in authorship or contributions. If one discovers any changes before publication, it can be revised after discussions with the co-authors. Conversely, if the detection is made post-publication, one can contact the journal along with the written agreements and evidence of contributions, and request for a correction or a retraction of the paper.http://www.pubmanu.com/authorship-disputes-tips-avoid-conflicts/http://www.pubmanu.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/cartoon05-1016x1024.jpghttp://www.pubmanu.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/cartoon05-150x150.jpgAnalytical Study designBiologyChemistryInterdisciplinary researchmedicalMedical researchMedical writingResearchResearch and WritingResearch PublicationScienceScience and TechnologywritingWriting & Editingacademic publications,authorship,authorship and contributions,authorship criteria,Authorship Disputes,collegial relationships,Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE),Council of Science Editors,Good Publication Practice,ICMJE,International Committee of Medical Journal Editors,non-contributing author,retraction,Tips to avoid authorship disputes,WAME‘Authorship’ denotes the practice of providing truthful credits for intellectual contributions and innovative concepts. It not only helps authors acquire the credit for the work, but also ensures that they assume responsibility for the research conducted and presented. Moreover, it is perceived as a tool for personal satisfaction, prestige,...SHEILAGitanjali Marthagitanjali.email@example.comEditorPubmanu